Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorjoe.hannon
    • CommentTimeDec 14th 2014

    In transgression it states that for a fibration FiPpXF\overset{i}{\to} P\overset{p}{\to} X, an element ωH dR n(F)\omega \in H^n_\text{dR}(F) is transgressive if there exists csΩ n(P)\text{cs}\in\Omega^n(P) such that i *cs=ωi^*\text{cs}=\omega and dω=p *κd\omega=p^*\kappa for κΩ n+1(X).\kappa\in\Omega^{n+1}(X).

    Is this right? It doesn’t seem to make sense, since the pullback of a form on the base XX should give a form on the total space PP. Maybe it is supposed to say d(cs)=p *κd(\text{cs})=p^*\kappa? I checked the cited source by Borel, and the sentence is ambiguous there.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorjoe.hannon
    • CommentTimeDec 14th 2014

    Proposition 18.13 of Bott and Tu agrees that transgression is defined in the sensible way. I edited the article. Thanks.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 14th 2014
    • (edited Dec 14th 2014)

    Yes, dcsd cs of course, this was a typo. Thanks for catching and fixing it.