Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

(0 2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry beauty book bundle bundles categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science connection constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology deformation-theory derived-geometry descent differential differential-cohomology differential-geometry duality elliptic-cohomology factorization-system fibration foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra general topology geoemtry geometric geometric-quantization geometry gravity group-theory higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-geoemtry higher-geometry higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration-theory internal-categories k-theory kan lie lie-algebras lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure measure-theory meta modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology n-groups newpage nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory operator operator-algebra order-theory philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject supergeometry symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry tannaka terminology theory topological topology topos topos-theory torsor tqft type-theory variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJun 6th 2010
    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJun 6th 2010

    Thanks for Kleene equality; I have added some examples to it. (Teaching junior-college algebra makes one think about this sort of thing, at least if one has a mind like mine.)

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJun 6th 2010

    Is there a word for an equality which means “if the LHS is defined, then so is the RHS and they are equal”?

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeJun 6th 2010
    Freyd calls it "directed equality" on page 3 of Categories, Allegories.
    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJun 6th 2010

    Directed equality is particularly important for rewriting rules. So if you ever see x 2/xx^2/x and are confident that it arises legitimately (that is, that it must be defined in the context at hand, or it would never have been written down), then you are allowed to simplify it to xx. But if you write down x 2/xx^2/x yourself, without first checking that it is defined, then you do not know that it is equivalent to xx (but only to x,x0x, x \ne 0).

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJun 6th 2010

    “Directed equality” isn’t quite ideally evocative for me, although I see the intent, but calling it a “rewrite rule” is pretty good.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJun 7th 2010
    • (edited Jun 7th 2010)

    But the proposition that A=BA = B if AA is defined is different from the rewrite rule that AA can be replaced by BB. Rewrite rules are usually rules for simplifying expressions, or at least for getting them into a more useful form, and one is selective about them. Given a collection of terms and a collection of rewrite rules between them, there is a derived notion of equality (two terms are equal iff they can be rewritten to the same result), which is not the same thing; and even this (which is symmetric after all) doesn’t match the directed equality.

    For example, nobody would propose 73+47 \rightsquigarrow 3 + 4 as a rewrite rule for elementary arithmetic, even though adding it to the usual rewrite rules would preserve the derived notion of equality and 7>=3+47 \gt\!\!\!= 3 + 4 (there should be no space at all between ‘>\gt’ and ‘==’, to make a single symbol for directed equality) is certainly true; that’s because it’s not a useful step to take.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJun 7th 2010

    I added a note about models which also alludes to directed equality.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJun 7th 2010

    Ok, fair enough.